Use case

Sharpr for Marketing

Every eighteen months, your brand starts over

Marketing rotates people faster than almost any other function. A brand manager holds a brand for a year and a half, then moves. An agency relationship runs three years and ends. A new CMO arrives and the org chart rearranges itself.

Each transition is normal. Each one also quietly deletes a layer of knowledge: why the positioning shifted in 2022, what the creative testing showed about the previous campaign platform, which media mix worked in a specific market, what consumers said in the segmentation study that cost three hundred thousand dollars.

The research still exists. It is in a former manager's folder, on an agency's server, in an email thread, or in a deck called final_v7. We built Sharpr so that it stays findable through every rotation instead.

What this costs you today

You buy the same research twice. Brand teams in one portfolio commission overlapping consumer work because no team can see the others' libraries. It adds up to real money annually and nobody ever sees the total in one place.

Campaign lessons do not compound. Post-campaign analysis is the single most underused asset in marketing. It gets presented once, filed, and forgotten, so the next campaign repeats mistakes the last team already paid to discover.

Your agency has better institutional memory than you do. Their account leads have been on the business longer than your brand managers have. That is a dependency, and it turns into a problem during a roster review.

Briefs get written from memory. The brief is supposed to be where research enters the creative process. In practice it gets written in two days under deadline with whatever context the author happens to recall.

Global and local work in parallel. A market team runs consumer research that would have helped three other markets, and nobody finds out.

What we built

One hub for everything the brand knows

We centralize documents, reports, videos, and articles, then automatically process, tag, summarize, and connect them. Segmentation studies, brand trackers, concept tests, creative testing reels, shopper research, media performance reviews, agency strategy decks, social listening, post-campaign analysis.

Video matters more here than in most functions. Focus group reels and ethnography footage carry nuance that never survives the summary deck. We keep them next to the written material rather than in a separate video library nobody remembers exists.

External content comes in through Sharp It, our one-click browser bookmarklet. Trend pieces, competitor campaign coverage, retailer announcements, cultural signals. Click it and it is in the hub with the source preserved.

Search that fits how briefs get written

Our GenAI search takes plain language. A brand manager writing a brief can ask what the research says about the occasion the product is used in. A creative strategist can ask what past testing showed about humor in the category. A shopper marketer can ask what studies exist on decisions at the shelf.

Answers come with AI summaries, which means someone with two days can review the evidence rather than writing from memory. Over time this raises the floor on brief quality across the whole organization, which is a much bigger effect than it sounds like.

Distribution to people who will never browse

Brand leaders, sales teams, agency partners, executives. Our briefs, newsletters, and alerts reach them, tailored by role.

What marketing organizations run:

  • A monthly consumer trends newsletter, cut differently for brand teams, sales, and the executive group.
  • Alerts to a brand team whenever new content lands on their category, brand, or competitive set.
  • A campaign readiness brief that assembles all the relevant research for a launch into one package for the review meeting.
  • A quarterly brand health digest pulling tracker results plus the qualitative context behind them.
  • A shared hub for agency partners, so the brief is not the only context they ever receive.

Make campaign lessons permanent

The highest return change most marketing teams make is a small one: require that every campaign post-mortem lands in the hub, tagged and summarized.

Individually each is a document. Collectively they become a searchable record of what works for your brands, in your categories, with your consumers. Two years in, a new brand manager searches "what have we learned about launch creative in this category" and gets a real answer in their first week instead of their fourth month.

Show what the research is worth

Our analytics report on what gets used, by which teams, how often. Insights leaders use it to defend budgets, renegotiate syndicated subscriptions, and prioritize new work. It also exposes gaps, because repeated searches on a thin topic tell you exactly what to commission.

Three scenarios you will recognize

A brand manager takes over a brand. Instead of six weeks of meetings and a shared drive expedition, she opens the brand hub: the segmentation study, three years of tracker results, creative testing history, the last four campaign post-mortems, the competitive analysis, and the agency's strategy work. Her manager checks engagement analytics to see what she has covered and coaches on the gaps. She writes a credible brief in month one.

Avoiding a duplicate study. Before signing off on a usage and attitudes study, an insights director searches and finds comparable work from a sister brand fourteen months ago, plus a shopper study covering part of the same ground. The new project gets rescoped to the open questions, and the saved budget funds work that did not previously exist.

Changing creative agencies. Because the outgoing agency's strategy work, research, and campaign analysis has been landing in the hub throughout the relationship, the incoming agency gets onboarded from your knowledge base rather than from a handover document. The new relationship starts months ahead of where it otherwise would.

Who gets value across the marketing org

Consumer insights own the hub and stop being a retrieval service. Their time moves back to analysis and study design.

Brand teams search when writing briefs, planning, and taking over a brand. This is where the rotation problem gets fixed.

Shopper and category teams find retail and path-to-purchase research without routing through insights.

Creative and content teams get testing history and consumer context that usually only reaches them through a brief.

Media teams use performance reviews to avoid repeating allocations that did not work.

Sales and commercial teams receive category briefs they can take into retailer conversations.

Agency partners work from a scoped hub instead of whatever the brief included.

The CMO's office receives scheduled digests and uses engagement analytics to see which research is influencing the organization.

Pricing is user-based with enterprise options, so most organizations start with insights and one or two brand teams and expand as demand builds.

Global structures without central bottlenecks

Global brand teams, regional hubs, local markets, category teams. Some material is market-restricted for legal or commercial reasons.

We support multiple hubs with role-based access down to individual content, so global maintains a central library while each region runs its own environment with controlled sharing between them. A market team gets the global research plus their own local work and no exposure to another market's confidential pricing analysis.

Access runs through SSO with ADFS, Okta, SAML 2.0, or Google Workspace, with SCIM 2.0 provisioning, configurable password policies, and bulk lifecycle and offboarding workflows. Agency partners get scoped external access that ends cleanly when the relationship does, which is a detail procurement will appreciate.

Security throughout: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, logical tenant isolation, SOC 2 aligned cloud infrastructure, ISO 27001 compliance, GDPR compliance, DDoS protection, redundant servers, encrypted backups, annual disaster recovery testing, and 24/7 monitoring.

What we are not

We are not a DAM. We do not manage your creative assets, handle version control on artwork, or serve files to production partners.

We are not a marketing automation platform or a campaign execution tool. We hold what you have learned and get it to the people making decisions. Everything downstream of that decision belongs to other software.

The adoption question

Marketing teams have watched insight portals get launched and abandoned. The reason is always the same: the platform assumed people would come looking. We do not assume that. Researchers, strategists, and brand managers search because it saves them real time. Executives, sales, and agency partners receive briefs and change nothing.

Implementation includes a dedicated customer experience manager and training built per group, so a brand manager and an insights analyst get sessions relevant to their actual jobs.

Bringing your archive over

SharePoint, a legacy insights portal, Box, Google Drive, agency servers, or a decade of folders. We migrate it free of charge, including content, structure, users, permissions, and archives.

A practical test

Pick a brand and ask what your organization has learned about it in the last three years. If the answer takes three meetings and a folder hunt, that is the problem we solve. Request a demo and bring the brand.

Trusted by industry leaders

See Sharpr in action.

Get started free and bring the hard question.

Try Sharpr